top of page
Search

Are Invisible Bead Extensions better than tape in hair extensions?

  • hairbydanielledavi9
  • Oct 18
  • 3 min read

Are Invisible Bead Extensions better than tape in hair extensions?

 

Invisible Bead Extensions (IBE) method is often considered better than the traditional Tape‑In Hair Extensions method. However, what “better” means in this context. Of course, “better” always depends on your hair type, budget, lifestyle and priority (look vs. hair health vs cost).

What makes Invisible Bead Extensions better? There are several key advantages of IBE over tape‑ins. The following narrative will discuss the differing dynamics of I.B.E. vs. Tape-in extensions, and how to decide which is best for you; 

It isn’t given its name for nothin! These installs are a virtually invisible/undetectable installation. With IBE, the wefts or rows are attached via tiny beads and the weft lies almost flush with your natural hair and scalp, while staying slightly off the scalp. This creates less visible attachment points. By contrast, tape‑ins use adhesive strips that sandwich a section of your natural hair. If not applied perfectly (or if your hair is very fine), the tape edge can show, especially in up‑dos, ponytails or when the hair grows out.

            Significantly less tension and damage to natural hair/scalp. Because IBE sits slightly off the scalp (e.g., “2 mm away from your scalp” in some describes) and relies on a bead + weft method rather than adhesive, there is reportedly less traction and irritation. In contrast, tape‑ins rely on glue/adhesive which must hold the natural hair + extension weft together; removal especially can risk pulling on hair and adhesion breakdown.

Pony tail safe and better styling flexibility. IBE’s attachment is designed to hide and be strong (and not rely on a flat tape strip at root level), you can more comfortably do higher ponytails, up‑dos, etc. without worrying about seeing the attachment or the tape edge. Tape‑ins can still look very good, but if the tape placement is too low, or hair is very fine, you may see the edge or feel some lift or especially when you tie your hair up.

 No mess and sticky adhesive/glue/residue. IBE avoids the use of adhesive strips (or at least reduces reliance on chemical adhesives), there is less risk of adhesive residue on your scalp/hair, less required use of solvents or strong removers, which can be harsher on natural hair.

In contrast, Tape‑Ins still have benefits and IBE isn’t automatically “perfect”. It’s important to see the trade‑offs. Tape‑ins have their place. For instance: They are generally quicker to apply (pre‑taped wefts) and often less expensive initially. They can give an excellent flat look when done correctly, especially in someone with medium to thick hair. Many clients find they work well if their hair type and lifestyle are a match.

Challenges for IBE include: They tend to cost more (because of the method and skill required). They require a skilled installer; incorrect bead placement can still cause problems. Not all hair types will be ideal for one method vs another. Fine/thinning hair may still require careful consideration whichever method.

Putting it all together: IBE is often considered better than tape‑ins if your priority is a very natural look (especially with up‑dos or partings), minimal visible attachment, lower damage/traction, and you’re willing to invest more and commit to proper maintenance and a good stylist.

If instead your priority is lower initial cost, quicker install, or you have thick hair and don’t do a lot of styling that risks revealing attachments then tape‑ins may still be a great option.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page